Dec. 3, 2014 (San Diego) Mexico is fast becoming what it once was that is a dictablanda. The short trist by Mexicans with democracy is coming fast to an end. The latest actions by the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI), the Partido de Accion Nacional (PAN) and the Partido Vede Ecologista de Mexico (PVEM) is essentially the suspension of peaceful marches.
The right to assemble is a basic human right, first enshrined in the United States Bill of Rights. It was one of those features of the Enlightenment that have survived. It is also enshrined in the United Nations Convention on Human Rights. It was until recently part of the Mexican Constitution. In a recent vote, the Congress decided to make marches contingent on whether they are dangerous or not, essentially criminalizing civil engagement and free speech. After all, who determines what march is dangerous? The state does, and given the tens of thousands of people who have come to the streets to peacefully demand the president of Mexico step down, those marches are likely to be deemed dangerous.
The Mexican Congress is quickly reverting to the totalitarian iron fisted way of running Mexico. They have voted to suspend the rights of people to peacefully assemble and demonstrate in the streets. This is not all of the parties, The Partido de la Revolution Democratica (PRD) came out against this. The PRD is a left wing party, and ironically has been weakened in it’s protestations since the Mayor of Iguala ran on the PRD plank.
Ricardo Mejia of Coyuntura Ciudadana, another left of center organization, told La Jornada “En la coyuntura política y social que vive el país, este dictamen es inoportuno. La reforma bien puede utilizarse como una coartada para la represión y frenar el legítimo derecho del pueblo a manifestarse, al libre tránsito. Estamos ante la previsible contradicción entre dos derechos constitucionales, el de tránsito y el de movilidad”
“In this political and social moment that the country lives, this is inopportune. This reforme can be used for repression and to slow down the legitimate right of the people to manifest itself, the free transit of people We are before the predicable conflict of two rights that of free movement and assembly.”
Still, this is a moment where we would expect the United States Government to break its silence regarding Mexico. So far, Washington has said nothing of what is happening in Mexico, well, except for a letter sent from Senators to the State Department where they expressed their fears that things are starting to get out of control. After all, we are the champions of democracy and as such laws that subvert the independence of municipal governments and the right to assemble and petition the government should be alarming to DC.
Yet, the silence is deafening It is like nothing is happening. Or at least nothing that is of concern to the administration of President Barack Obama. Perhaps Washington prefers what is going on in Mexico. For all we know, this is good for business. Yet, the disappearance of the students near Iguala, and the army executing people at Tlataya, State of Mexico are but the tip of an iceberg, What we are seeing is the emergence of a totalitarian state where neoliberal reforms are easier to carry out.
The Obama administration seems to have little to say anything about the events in Mexico. What would be at risk? Perhaps, if the demands of the streets in Mexico succeed, North American Free Trade Agreement will be at risk, as well as Transpacific Partnership. The people, on both sides of the border, are tired of neoliberal reforms that are transforming both economies into the play ground of the very rich. The events in Iguala are the straw that broke that camel’s back as far as Mexico is concerned.
We also have high levels of corruption, which again, seem to be a topic of non-discussion in Washington. There is serious impunity for police forces in Mexico; There is a feeling that perhaps we are avoiding this topic as well, since it brings a mirror to what is happening in the United Sates. We gave seen this now in both Ferguson Missouri, and New York City.
The U.S. Government does not want to say a thing. President Enrique Pena Nieto promised the opening of large swaths of the Mexican economy, in particular the energy sector, to foreign investment. This the United States does not want to risk. So silence is consent.
At one point Enrique Castaneda wrote how distant these two neighbors were. The cultures are different, we were told, and there were many misunderstandings at the highest levels of government. I am starting to wonder if this silence means that these distant neighbors have become very close and we are seeing a convergence of goals.
This is a historic moment and the U.S. cannot stay silent. Or rather, the U.S. Should not stay silent.
So why should Americans care? After all, we know that many in this country really are not paying attention to what is happening in the country, let alone events south of the border? Mexico is at a very dangerous point. The repression that is starting could lead to political refugees moving north. It could also lead to a social explosion not seen since 1910. Either of these will mean the end of the business as usual, nothing to see here, attitude because we will not be able to ignore it.
Those of us who live in the border region will be the first to notice, there is no doubt in my mind. Changes are afoot, The only question is how long? The words of President John F. Kennedy are very appropriate right now: “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”
Nadin Abbott holds a Masters Degree in Mexican History from San Diego State University
Facebook: Reporting San Diego
We rely on donations to keep with the news. Gas and trolley passes, and camera equipment are not free. We make it easy though the pay pal button on the side.